You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 2 Patient’s characteristics

From: Limited impact of a top-down approach to improve enhanced recovery programme in French university hospitals: a before-after retrospective survey

Patient’s characteristics Age (years)
2015/2017/p*
Sex (male: n/%)
2015/2017/p
ASA score
(1, 2, 3, 4; n/%)
2015/2017/p
Charlson
(2015/2017/p)
Live style: not living alone (n/%)
2015/2017/p
TKA
(n = 195/137)
70.9 (10.6)/67.7 (11.7)
P = 0.004
61 (31.3)/36 (26.3)
NS
1 = 14 (7.2)/11 (8.0)
2 = 113 (57.9)/94 (68.6)
3 = 48 (24.6)/16 (11.7)
P = 0.034
0 = 5 (2.6)/6 (4.4)
1 = 12 (6.2)/17 (12.4)
2–7 = 178 (91.3)/114 (83.2)
P = 0.084
98 (50.3)/39 (28.5)
P < 0.0001
Colectomy
(n = 163/96)
61.5 (14.9)/60.6 (14.4)
NS
89 (54.6)/47 (49.0)
NS
1 = 26 (16.0)/26 (27.1)
2 = 94 (57.7)/52 (54.2)
3: 25 (15.3)/12 (12.5)
NS
0 = 36 (22.1)/22 (22.9)
1 = 27 (16.6)/22 (22.9)
2–7 = 100 (61.3)/52 (54.2)
P = 0.399
93 (57.1)/34 (35.4)
P < 0.0001
Hysterectomy
(n = 190/120)
52.5 (11.6)/51.4 (11)
NS
- 1 = 58 (30.5)/38 (31.7)
2 = 92 (48.4)/55 (45.8)
3 = 5 (2.6)/7 (5.8)
NS
0 = 99 (52.1)/69 (57.5)
1 = 44 (23.2)/24 (20.0)
2–7 = 47 (24.7)/27 (22.5)
P=0.643
95 (50.0)/49 (40.8)
P = 0.033
THA
(n = 99/66)
68.4 (14.9)/66.4 (14.2)
NS
35 (35.4)/27 (40.9)
NS
1 = 15 (15.2)/10 (15.2)
2 = 53 (53.5)/31 (47.0)
3 = 21 (21.2)/20 (30.3)
NS
0 = 11 (11.1)/8 (12.1)
1 = 16 (16.2)/13 (19.7)
2–7 = 72 (72.7)/45 (68.2)
P = 0.806
51 (51.5)/20 (30.3)
P < 0.0001
Gastrectomy
(n = 69/32)
62.9 (14.6)/65.4 (15)
NS
37 (53.6)/24 (75.0)
NS
1 = 11 (15.9)/2 (6.2)
2 = 35 (50.7)/14 (43.8)
3 = 18 (26.1)/7 (21.9)
P = 0.045
0 = 14 (20.3)/4 (12.5)
1 = 12 (17.4)/7 (21.9)
2–7 = 43 (62.3)/21 (65.6)
P = 0.602
45 (65.2)/11 (34.4)
P = 0.005
Ovariectomy
(n = 96/58)
48.4 (15)/45.9 (17.6)
NS
- 1 = 36 (37.5)/24 (41.4)
2 = 39 (40.6)/17 (29.3)
3 = 6 (6.2)/6 (10.3)
NS
0 = 53 (55.2)/32 (55.2)
1 = 20 (20.8)/14 (24.1)
2–7 = 23 (24.0)/12 (20.7)
P = 0.84
46 (47.9)/24 (41.4)
NS
  1. P*, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests
  2. The main demographic (age, sex), clinical (main pathology, comorbidities, ASA score) and sociologic (living alone) characteristics were collected simultaneously. The Charlson score was calculated for all patients and high score (i.e. 2–7) compared with low score (i.e. 0 and 1)